I really like the way Siemens described the way we learn in his article because I personally always struggled learning by my self even if what I needed to do was described to me. I thought and sometimes still do think that I am stupid for not understanding some of the articles that I read but when I look at the connectivsm model of learning I realize that I might not be the only person that struggles to learn on their own. I don't believe that I need to discuss everything that I come across of in order to understand them, for example most movies I don't discuss so much because I feel like I got a good grasp on cinematography. When I think about it however if I would come across a movie that I struggled understanding or a certain concept that I read in a article that I can't wrap my ideas around, I would rather discuss my misunderstanding with someone else than read extensive literature on the same subject. Both solutions may or may not be effective however discussion would definitely be my first choice. Seimens
says, "Connectivism also addresses the challenges that many corporations face in knowledge management activities. Knowledge that resides in a database needs to be connected with the right people in the right context in order to be classified as learning. Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism do not attempt to address the challenges of organizational knowledge and transference.
"Information flow within an organization is an important element in organizational effectiveness. In a knowledge economy, the flow of information is the equivalent of the oil pipe in an industrial economy. Creating, preserving, and utilizing information flow should be a key organizational activity. Knowledge flow can be likened to a river that meanders through the ecology of an organization. In certain areas, the river pools and in other areas it ebbs. The health of the learning ecology of the organization depends on effective nurturing of information flow."
In one of the videos Seimens explain how there are two components in is model of connectivism and they are internal neuro network as well as the external component. Seimens later
says " We might not be able to control how individual internal neurons connect with each other but we can certainly connect with other individuals and with other sources of information". I think that Seimens has a very good understanding of how knowledge can be accessed in order for it to be learned. I think that he is wrong by saying that learning or knowledge changed because I think people always had the chances to discuss knowledge with each other but he is right that the process is easier now. I don't see how the way people learn in its basic essence necessarily as to do with the way technology evolves.
In the end I have to say I am a big fan of Connectivism because I can identify to it and also because technology will facilitate the models effectiveness for today's learners.